01/24/2015 at 14:29 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
Thanks to this.
![]() 01/24/2015 at 14:33 |
|
I have no problem with that.
And what a great looking coupe - only the BMW M4 gives it a run for its money.
![]() 01/24/2015 at 14:40 |
|
![]() 01/24/2015 at 14:41 |
|
Nah.
They'd do it for one model, which I'm guessing would the R8 successor or the car to be above the R8.
But to make all their cars hybrid? There's a ton of purists who buy the RS cars.
01/24/2015 at 14:50 |
|
Because efficiency and EV mode for city centers and more torque.
![]() 01/24/2015 at 14:51 |
|
I'd rather see Audi cars not being fat pigs despite advertising "ultra" lightweight with their Le Mans cars.
![]() 01/24/2015 at 14:51 |
|
Love those guys ... it isn't a 911 if it's not air cooled!
![]() 01/24/2015 at 14:53 |
|
From dumping fuel into the exhaust to a full hybrid range. How times change.
![]() 01/24/2015 at 14:55 |
|
I have less of a problem with Audis going hybrid as I do BMWs, because Audis have pretty much never purported themselves as a purist driving car, but were technological cars designed to be fast, not feel good. A la Nissan GT-R.
![]() 01/24/2015 at 15:02 |
|
If they cared about efficiency so much then why put a N/A engine in the RS5?
01/24/2015 at 15:08 |
|
They also advertise AWD, and that adds weight.
01/24/2015 at 15:11 |
|
Don't worry, you won't see it on the next generation. Because TFSI.
![]() 01/24/2015 at 15:42 |
|
Than chose one. The RS5 was more than 100kg heavier than a C63 Coupe. (Not to say that other's are better, the E92 M3 was only 10kg less than the RS5)